What is the fuel economy of a 1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD?

EPA figures for the 1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD reach 14 MPG combined depending on configuration; the table on this page lists every tested engine and transmission combination.

Are there recalls on the 1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD?

NHTSA lists 6 safety recall campaigns for the 1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD. Check your specific vehicle by VIN on the official NHTSA site - recalls are fixed free of charge by dealers.

What are common problems with the 1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD?

Owners have filed 1 complaints with NHTSA for the 1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD, most often about: Tires. Complaint counts reflect what owners report, not confirmed defects.

Ford · 1984

1984 Ford E250 Econoline 2WD

Official EPA fuel economy and NHTSA recall record, best combined figure 14 MPG.

Fuel economy (EPA)

Engine	Transmission	Fuel	City	Highway	Combined	CO2 g/mi
4.9L 6-cyl	Automatic 3-spd	Regular	12	14	13	684
4.9L 6-cyl	Automatic 4-spd	Regular	11	15	13	684
4.9L 6-cyl	Manual 3-spd	Regular	14	15	14	635
5.0L 8-cyl	Automatic 4-spd	Regular	11	15	13	684
5.8L 8-cyl	Automatic 3-spd	Regular	10	11	10	889
5.8L 8-cyl	Automatic 3-spd	Regular	10	12	11	808
4.9L 6-cyl	Automatic 3-spd	Regular	12	15	13	684
4.9L 6-cyl	Automatic 4-spd	Regular	12	15	13	684
4.9L 6-cyl	Manual 3-spd	Regular	13	15	14	635
5.0L 8-cyl	Automatic 4-spd	Regular	11	14	12	741
5.8L 8-cyl	Automatic 3-spd	Regular	9	10	9	987

Safety recalls (NHTSA)

6 campaigns on record for this model year. Recall repairs are free at dealers; check your exact vehicle by VIN on nhtsa.gov/recalls.

Campaign 84V119000

THE SECONDARY THROTTLE SHAFT MAY, WITH ACCUMULATED MILEAGE, BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MAY STICK IN A PARTIALLY OPEN POSITION WHILE DRIVING.

Campaign 84V014000

SOME VEHICLES MAY HAVE BEEN BUILT WITH IMPROPERLY MANUFACTURED WHEELS. THE WELDS SECURING THE CENTER SECTIONS TO THE RIMS MAY CRACK FROM FATIGUE.

Campaign 85V061000

WHEN FRONTALLY IMPACTED INTO A FIXED BARRIER AT 30 MPH, AS SPECIFIED IN FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD (FMVSS) NO. 301, THE LEFT FRAME RAILS OF SUCH VEHICLES MAY DISPLACE INBOARD, PINCHING THE FUEL/WATER SEPARATOR CANISTER BETWEEN THE FRAME RAIL AND ENGINE SUFFICIENTLY TO DISPLACE THE FUEL/WATER SEPARATOR DRAIN ROD, ALLOWING THE CONTENTS OF THE CANISTER TO DRAIN.

Campaign 87V144000

VEHICLES ARE SUBJECT TO EXCESSIVE UNDERHOOD TEMPERATURES AND FUEL SYSTEM PRESSURES IN SEVERE DUTY APPLICATIONS.

Campaign 88V133000

EXTREME OPERATING CONDITIONS COULD CAUSE PREMATURE DETERIORATION OF THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT HEATER HOSES OR ENGINE BYPASS HOSES.

Campaign 07E064000

CERTAIN FEDERAL-MOGUL AFTERMARKET FUEL PUMPS SOLD UNDER THE BRAND NAMES OF CARTER, ACCUFLOW, NAPA, TRUFLOW, PARTS DEPO, AND PARTS MASTER, SHIPPED BETWEEN AUGUST 2006 AND JULY 2007 FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE FUEL PUMP DIAPHRAGM IN CERTAIN PRODUCTION RUNS MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY INSTALLED OR INADEQUATELY TESTED WHICH MAY CAUSE THE FUEL PUMP TO LEAK.

Owner complaints (NHTSA)

1 complaints filed by owners for this model year. Complaints are owner reports, not confirmed defects - browse them in full on nhtsa.gov.

Tires 1

Decode this car's VIN All Ford models

Sources: EPA fueleconomy.gov, the NHTSA recalls, complaints and 5-Star Safety Ratings databases (all US public data), refreshed monthly. Recall texts are quoted from the official record. Details on About & Data Sources.